Albert Biete

2.0k citations
84 papers · 1.6k · h-index 22

Impact in

Papers in

Albert Biete

81 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Albert Biete
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 247
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 325
  • Oncology 378
  • Otorhinolaryngology 58
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 258
Replace Lawrence Berk with:
Lawrence Berk United States
Hana Fakhoury Saudi Arabia
George Mathew India
Guo‐Pei Yu United States
Kazuyoshi Shigehara Japan
Rachana Singh United States
Marie‐France Fassotte Belgium
Kenichi Furuya Japan
Li Ma China
Gerardo Salerno Italy
Albert Biete relative to Lawrence Berk United States Lawrence Berk's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.1×
Lawrence Berk · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Albert Biete

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Albert Biete's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Albert Biete with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Albert Biete more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Albert Biete

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Albert Biete. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Albert Biete. The network helps show where Albert Biete may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Albert Biete, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Albert Biete Line = papers co-authored together Albert Biete links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 84 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997171
2 2008145
3 2012115
4 2007102
5 200378
6 200669
7 199861
8 201850
9 200239
10 199838
11 200137
12 200636
13
CYFRA 21.1 in patients with cervical cancer: comparison with SCC and CEA.
200535
14 199933
15 200732
16 201830
17 200030
18 200726
19 201122
20 200922

About Albert Biete

Albert Biete is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oncology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Surgery, having authored 84 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (18 papers), Effects of Radiation Exposure (9 papers), Head and Neck Cancer Studies (8 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (8 papers), Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis (6 papers), Management of metastatic bone disease (4 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (4 papers) and Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (247 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (325 citations), Oncology (378 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (58 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (258 citations). Albert Biete has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Á. Rovirosa, Meritxell Arenas, Francesc Casas, Julián Panés, Ferrán Ferrer, Joan Casals, Víctor Hernández, Meritxell Gironella, S. Sabater and Josep M. Piqué. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical & Translational Oncology, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, Radiotherapy and Oncology, Medical dosimetry and Radiation Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact