Alan Weir
Impact in
- Theoretical Computer Science top 10%
-
- Philosophy and History of Science
- Philosophy, Science, and History
Papers in
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science 12
-
- Philosophy and History of Science 6
- Philosophy, Science, and History 3
- Co-authors
- Stewart Shapiro (2 shared papers)J. Alberto Coffa (1 shared paper)Harold D. Green (1 shared paper)Jamie Tappenden (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Analysis (3 papers)Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic (2 papers)Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (2 papers)The Philosophical Quarterly (2 papers)Grazer Philosophische Studien (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Alan Weir
20 papers receiving 136 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
- Theoretical Computer Science 15
- History and Philosophy of Science 52
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 98
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 60
- Philosophy 38
Countries citing papers authored by Alan Weir
This map shows the geographic impact of Alan Weir's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alan Weir with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alan Weir more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Alan Weir
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alan Weir. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alan Weir. The network helps show where Alan Weir may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 4 scholars most cited alongside Alan Weir, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2003 | 34 | |
| 2 | 1990 | 33 | |
| 3 | 2000 | 22 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 20 | |
| 5 | 1994 | 9 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 9 | |
| 7 | 2010 | 6 | |
| 8 | Naïve set theory, paraconsistency and indeterminacy: Part II | 1999 | 5 |
| 9 | 1986 | 4 | |
| 10 | 1954 | 4 | |
| 11 | 2004 | 4 | |
| 12 | 2000 | 2 | |
| 13 | 1998 | 2 | |
| 14 | 1986 | 2 | |
| 15 | 1993 | 2 | |
| 16 | 1985 | 1 | |
| 17 | Kit Fine Precis. Discussion | 2005 | 1 |
| 18 | Metatheoretic Results for a Non-Transitive Logic | 2013 | 1 |
| 19 | 1996 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1996 | 1 |
About Alan Weir
Alan Weir is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy, Artificial Intelligence and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 26 papers that have together received 166 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (12 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (6 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (3 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (3 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (2 papers), Embodied and Extended Cognition (1 paper), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (1 paper) and Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Theoretical Computer Science (15 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (52 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (98 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (60 citations) and Philosophy (38 citations). Alan Weir has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Stewart Shapiro, J. Alberto Coffa, Harold D. Green and Jamie Tappenden. Their work appears in journals such as Analysis, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, The Philosophical Quarterly and Grazer Philosophische Studien.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.