Alan Weir

497 citations
37 papers · 280 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Alan Weir

27 papers receiving 237 citations

Peers

Alan Weir
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Theoretical Computer Science 23
  • History and Philosophy of Science 84
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 167
  • Philosophy 74
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 90
Replace Charles McCarty with:
Charles McCarty United States
Kai Frederick Wehmeier United States
Jeffrey Ketland United Kingdom
Alexander C. Paseau United Kingdom
Sean Drysdale Walsh United States
Allen Hazen Australia
Mario Gómez‐Torrente Mexico
Sanford Shieh United States
Jared Warren United States
Gabriel Uzquiano United States
Alan Weir relative to Charles McCarty United States Charles McCarty's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.2×
Charles McCarty · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Alan Weir

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Alan Weir's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alan Weir with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alan Weir more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Alan Weir

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alan Weir. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alan Weir. The network helps show where Alan Weir may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Alan Weir, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Alan Weir Line = papers co-authored together Alan Weir links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199051
2 200340
3 200527
4 200027
5 201321
6 200718
7 199412
8 201511
9 201010
10 20048
11 20068
12
Naïve set theory, paraconsistency and indeterminacy: Part II
19996
13 19866
14 20055
15 19545
16 19934
17 20044
18 19863
19 19982
20 20002

About Alan Weir

Alan Weir is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science, having authored 37 papers that have together received 280 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (16 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (9 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (4 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (4 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (3 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (2 papers), Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (2 papers) and History and Theory of Mathematics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Theoretical Computer Science (23 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (84 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (167 citations), Philosophy (74 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (90 citations). Alan Weir has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Stewart B. Shapiro, J. Alberto Coffa, Harold D. Green and Jamie Tappenden. Their work appears in journals such as Analysis, Grazer Philosophische Studien, The Philosophical Quarterly, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Hardback) and Mind.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact