Alan Millar

2.1k citations
46 papers · 724 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Alan Millar

40 papers receiving 620 citations

Peers

Alan Millar
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Philosophy 539
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 395
  • History and Philosophy of Science 128
  • Family Practice 23
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 252
Replace Michael R. DePaul with:
Michael R. DePaul United States
Ram Neta United States
Sven Bernecker United States
Kieran Setiya United States
Carl Ginet United States
Clayton Littlejohn United Kingdom
Jane Friedman United States
John Koethe United States
Stephen Hetherington Australia
John Hyman United Kingdom
Alan Millar relative to Michael R. DePaul United States Michael R. DePaul's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Michael R. DePaul · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Alan Millar

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Alan Millar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alan Millar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alan Millar more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Alan Millar

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alan Millar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alan Millar. The network helps show where Alan Millar may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Alan Millar, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Alan Millar Line = papers co-authored together Alan Millar links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010199
2 200451
3 199847
4 199144
5 200439
6 200737
7 201135
8 199233
9
Reason and nature : essays in the theory of rationality
200232
10 200026
11 200921
12 201121
13 201916
14 201414
15
The Measure of Mind: Propositional Attitudes and their Attribution
201011
16 20119
17 19879
18 19919
19 20078
20 20027

About Alan Millar

Alan Millar is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, History and Philosophy of Science and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 46 papers that have together received 724 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (19 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (17 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (7 papers), Free Will and Agency (3 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (3 papers), Theology and Philosophy of Evil (3 papers), Embodied and Extended Cognition (2 papers) and Biblical Studies and Interpretation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (539 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (395 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (128 citations), Family Practice (23 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (252 citations). Alan Millar has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Duncan Pritchard, Adrian Haddock, Jerry A. Fodor, José Luis Bermúdez, Janet Martin Soskice, Jonathan Riley, Fred Wilson, Geoffrey Scarre, C. L. Ten and Alan Ryan. Their work appears in journals such as The Philosophical Quarterly, Mind, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, The Philosophical Review and Philosophical Issues.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact