Alan Ford

785 citations
16 papers · 108 · h-index 6

Impact in

  • History top 2%
    • Historical Studies of British Isles
    • Scottish History and National Identity
    • Reformation and Early Modern Christianity
    • Medieval Literature and History

Papers in

Alan Ford

14 papers receiving 74 citations

Peers

Alan Ford
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
  • History 70
  • Classics 9
  • Museology 4
  • Anthropology 10
  • Religious studies 4
Replace Francisco de Quevedo with:
Francisco de Quevedo Spain
Antonio Franceschetti United States
Miguel de Cervantès
Thomas Dekker
Geraint H. Jenkins United Kingdom
Cathy Shrank United Kingdom
Ricardo J. Quinones
John Whale United Kingdom
H. R. Woudhuysen United States
Newton Key United States
Alan Ford relative to Francisco de Quevedo Spain Francisco de Quevedo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Francisco de Quevedo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Alan Ford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Alan Ford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alan Ford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alan Ford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Alan Ford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alan Ford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alan Ford. The network helps show where Alan Ford may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Alan Ford, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Alan Ford Line = papers co-authored together Alan Ford links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 199823
2 198921
3 198818
4 200712
5 200511
6 20079
7 19955
8 19912
9
A sense of entry : designing the welcoming school
20072
10 20221
11 20141
12 20051
13 19851
14 19801
15 20130
16
Flexion, dérivation et Panini
19800

About Alan Ford

Alan Ford is a scholar working on History, Sociology and Political Science, Artificial Intelligence, History and Philosophy of Science and Information Systems, having authored 16 papers that have together received 108 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Studies of British Isles (8 papers), Irish and British Studies (4 papers), Spam and Phishing Detection (1 paper), Linguistic Studies and Language Acquisition (1 paper), Linguistic and Sociocultural Studies (1 paper), Natural Language Processing Techniques (1 paper), Canadian Identity and History (1 paper) and Philosophy and History of Science (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History (70 citations), Classics (9 citations), Museology (4 citations), Anthropology (10 citations) and Religious studies (4 citations). Alan Ford has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include F. David Peat, Andrew Hadfield, Willy Maley, Brendan Bradshaw, Peter Roberts‎, Philip Jenkins, Keith Brown, Jane Dawson, Jim Smyth and John McCafferty. Their work appears in journals such as The Seventeenth Century, Irish Theological Quarterly, Church History, Lingvisticae Investigationes and Foundations of Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact