Aimee Code
Impact in
- Insect Science top 5%
- Insect and Pesticide Research
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Family and Disability Support Research
- COVID-19 and Mental Health
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Papers in
-
- Plant and animal studies 5
-
- Insect and Pesticide Research 5
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control 3
- Co-authors
- Kathryn Asbury (3 shared papers)Laura Fox (3 shared papers)Umar Toseeb (3 shared papers)Emre Deniz (1 shared paper)Margaret R. Douglas (3 shared papers)David J. Smith (2 shared papers)Claudia Hitaj (2 shared papers)Sainath Suryanarayanan (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution (1 paper)The Science of The Total Environment (1 paper)Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (1 paper)Autism (1 paper)Biological Conservation (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomSweden
In The Last Decade
Aimee Code
7 papers receiving 631 citations
Aimee Code's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- Insect Science 178
- Clinical Psychology 265
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 145
- Cognitive Neuroscience 73
- Education 108
Countries citing papers authored by Aimee Code
This map shows the geographic impact of Aimee Code's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Aimee Code with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Aimee Code more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Aimee Code
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Aimee Code. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Aimee Code. The network helps show where Aimee Code may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 23 scholars most cited alongside Aimee Code, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | How is COVID-19 Affecting the Mental Health of Children with Special Educational Needs and Disabilities and Their Families? Hit paper breakdown → | 2020 | 397 |
| 2 | 2019 | 151 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 59 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 36 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 12 | |
| 6 | 2022 | 7 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 8 | 2025 | 0 |
About Aimee Code
Aimee Code is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science, Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Education, having authored 8 papers that have together received 665 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (5 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (5 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (3 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (3 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (2 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (2 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (1 paper) and Infant Development and Preterm Care (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (178 citations), Clinical Psychology (265 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (145 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (73 citations) and Education (108 citations). Aimee Code has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Kathryn Asbury, Laura Fox, Umar Toseeb, Emre Deniz, Margaret R. Douglas, David J. Smith, Claudia Hitaj, Sainath Suryanarayanan, Cristina Botías and Maj Rundlöf. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, The Science of The Total Environment, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, Autism and Biological Conservation.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.