Aim Sinpeng

506 citations
24 papers · 237 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Aim Sinpeng

21 papers receiving 221 citations

Peers

Aim Sinpeng
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • Communication 70
  • Political Science and International Relations 128
  • Sociology and Political Science 162
  • Gender Studies 22
  • Anthropology 13
Replace Geoffrey Cowan with:
Geoffrey Cowan United States
Babak Rahimi United States
Ashley Esarey United States
Philip Seib United States
Marco Deseriis Italy
Péter Bajomi‐Lázár Hungary
José Rama Spain
Sebastian Veg France
Nancy Snow United States
Pierre Ostiguy Chile
Aim Sinpeng relative to Geoffrey Cowan United States Geoffrey Cowan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Geoffrey Cowan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Aim Sinpeng

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Aim Sinpeng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Aim Sinpeng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Aim Sinpeng more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Aim Sinpeng

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Aim Sinpeng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Aim Sinpeng. The network helps show where Aim Sinpeng may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Aim Sinpeng, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Aim Sinpeng Line = papers co-authored together Aim Sinpeng links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202157
2 201938
3 202022
4 202021
5
Democracy from Above: Regime Transition in the Kingdom of Bhutan
200717
6 201212
7 202111
8 20158
9 20178
10 20147
11 20136
12 20186
13 20145
14 20235
15 20143
16 20243
17 20212
18 20212
19 20241
20 20161

About Aim Sinpeng

Aim Sinpeng is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Communication, Artificial Intelligence and Cultural Studies, having authored 24 papers that have together received 237 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies (14 papers), Asian Studies and History (6 papers), Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics (4 papers), Social Media and Politics (4 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (2 papers), Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection (2 papers), Populism, Right-Wing Movements (2 papers) and Socioeconomic Development in Asia (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (70 citations), Political Science and International Relations (128 citations), Sociology and Political Science (162 citations), Gender Studies (22 citations) and Anthropology (13 citations). Aim Sinpeng has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Dimitar D. Gueorguiev, Erik Martinez Kuhonta, Max Grömping, Angela O’Mahony, Benjamin Nyblade, Michele Ford, Fiona Martin, Katharine Gelber, Josh A. Goldstein and David V. Thiel. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Southeast Asia, Pacific Affairs, Journal of Information Technology & Politics, Electoral Studies and Critical Asian Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact