Agnès Chartier

822 citations
55 papers · 642 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Agnès Chartier

53 papers receiving 564 citations

Peers

Agnès Chartier
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 151
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 229
  • Spectroscopy 86
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 43
  • Mechanics of Materials 94
Replace David M. Gale with:
David M. Gale Mexico
Perry A. Hailey United Kingdom
Shubhajit Paul United States
Kim D. Summerhays United States
M. I. S. Sastry India
Sándor Kemény Hungary
Jostein Toft Norway
Mark W. Raynor United Kingdom
Iiris Kahn Estonia
Fernando Cunha Peixoto Brazil
Agnès Chartier relative to David M. Gale Mexico David M. Gale's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30.2×
David M. Gale · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Agnès Chartier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Agnès Chartier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Agnès Chartier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Agnès Chartier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Agnès Chartier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Agnès Chartier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Agnès Chartier. The network helps show where Agnès Chartier may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Agnès Chartier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Agnès Chartier Line = papers co-authored together Agnès Chartier links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 55 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198150
2 201537
3 199237
4 201633
5 201329
6 201627
7 199726
8 199722
9 199021
10 199719
11 198818
12 199718
13 199818
14 199517
15 201615
16 201515
17 199015
18 199915
19 202314
20 201813

About Agnès Chartier

Agnès Chartier is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Mechanical Engineering, Mechanics of Materials and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 55 papers that have together received 642 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation (20 papers), Advanced Frequency and Time Standards (18 papers), Advanced Measurement and Metrology Techniques (15 papers), Thermography and Photoacoustic Techniques (10 papers), Saffron Plant Research Studies (4 papers), Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research (4 papers), Laser Design and Applications (4 papers) and Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (151 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (229 citations), Spectroscopy (86 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (43 citations) and Mechanics of Materials (94 citations). Agnès Chartier has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Morocco. Frequent co-authors include J-M Chartier, Stephen E. Bialkowski, Claire Elfakir, Joseph Georges, Jonathan Hamon, J.M. Mermet, P. Juncar, J. Pinard, Stéphane Bostyn and Alessandra Lopes de Oliveira. Their work appears in journals such as Metrologia, European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, Molecules, European Journal of Organic Chemistry and Talanta.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact