A.G. Sharkey
Impact in
- Spectroscopy top 2%
- Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
- Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography
- Fuel Technology top 5%
Papers in
- Spectroscopy 24
- Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications 18
- Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography 14
-
- Analytical chemistry methods development 6
- Petroleum Processing and Analysis 4
- Co-authors
- R. A. Friedel (26 shared papers)J.L. Shultz (16 shared papers)David M. Hercules (14 shared papers)Stanley H. Langer (2 shared papers)Andrew Proctor (3 shared papers)Gusev Ai (2 shared papers)Michael Karas (1 shared paper)Franz Hillenkamp (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Analytical Chemistry (15 papers)Fuel (7 papers)Carbon (3 papers)Applied Spectroscopy (2 papers)Nature (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
A.G. Sharkey
53 papers receiving 949 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
- Spectroscopy 566
- Fuel Technology 19
- Analytical Chemistry 166
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 53
- Computational Mechanics 113
Countries citing papers authored by A.G. Sharkey
This map shows the geographic impact of A.G. Sharkey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A.G. Sharkey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A.G. Sharkey more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by A.G. Sharkey
This network shows the impact of papers produced by A.G. Sharkey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A.G. Sharkey. The network helps show where A.G. Sharkey may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside A.G. Sharkey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 55 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1957 | 151 | |
| 2 | 1956 | 100 | |
| 3 | 1956 | 99 | |
| 4 | 1959 | 95 | |
| 5 | 1995 | 72 | |
| 6 | 1991 | 68 | |
| 7 | 1956 | 49 | |
| 8 | 1989 | 38 | |
| 9 | 1989 | 29 | |
| 10 | 1959 | 27 | |
| 11 | 1966 | 24 | |
| 12 | 1963 | 23 | |
| 13 | 1993 | 22 | |
| 14 | 1967 | 21 | |
| 15 | 1970 | 20 | |
| 16 | 1977 | 18 | |
| 17 | 1972 | 18 | |
| 18 | 1953 | 18 | |
| 19 | 1988 | 18 | |
| 20 | 1993 | 17 |
About A.G. Sharkey
A.G. Sharkey is a scholar working on Spectroscopy, Analytical Chemistry, Biomedical Engineering, Fuel Technology and Computational Mechanics, having authored 55 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (18 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (14 papers), Coal and Coke Industries Research (7 papers), Analytical chemistry methods development (6 papers), Petroleum Processing and Analysis (4 papers), Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques (4 papers), Coal Properties and Utilization (4 papers) and Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Spectroscopy (566 citations), Fuel Technology (19 citations), Analytical Chemistry (166 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (53 citations) and Computational Mechanics (113 citations). A.G. Sharkey has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include R. A. Friedel, J.L. Shultz, David M. Hercules, Stanley H. Langer, Andrew Proctor, Gusev Ai, Michael Karas, Franz Hillenkamp, M. Paul Chiarelli and C.M. White. Their work appears in journals such as Analytical Chemistry, Fuel, Carbon, Applied Spectroscopy and Nature.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.