Adele Francis

1.4k citations
10 papers · 418 · h-index 7

Impact in

    • Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
    • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
    • HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research

Papers in

Adele Francis

9 papers receiving 406 citations

Peers

Adele Francis
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • Cancer Research 192
  • Oncology 113
  • Molecular Biology 177
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 36
  • Dermatology 13
Replace Vanessa de Luque with:
Vanessa de Luque Spain
Rodrigo Gonçalves Brazil
Maria Giuseppa Sarobba Italy
Anca Mera United Kingdom
Laura A. Cousens United States
Phuong Vu Norway
Agnieszka Gdowicz‐Kłosok Poland
Benlong Yang China
Weizhu Wu China
Miralem Mrkonjic Canada
Adele Francis relative to Vanessa de Luque Spain Vanessa de Luque's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.8×
Vanessa de Luque · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Adele Francis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Adele Francis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Adele Francis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Adele Francis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Adele Francis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Adele Francis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Adele Francis. The network helps show where Adele Francis may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Adele Francis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Adele Francis Line = papers co-authored together Adele Francis links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 2016153
2 2017145
3 201736
4 201524
5 201622
6 201418
7 201214
8 20164
9 20161
10 20161

About Adele Francis

Adele Francis is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Oncology, Molecular Biology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 10 papers that have together received 418 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (4 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (3 papers), Clinical practice guidelines implementation (2 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (2 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (1 paper), Gene expression and cancer classification (1 paper), Cancer-related gene regulation (1 paper) and Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (192 citations), Oncology (113 citations), Molecular Biology (177 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (36 citations) and Dermatology (13 citations). Adele Francis has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Abeer M. Shaaban, Sarah E. Pinder, John M.S. Bartlett, Robert C. Stein, Daniel Rea, J. Louise Jones, Gillian Farnie, Ernesto Guccione, Agnieszka Zielińska and Jingxian Zhang. Their work appears in journals such as The Breast, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Histopathology, Cell Reports and JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact