Adam Vanous
Impact in
- Plant Science top 10%
- Genetics and Plant Breeding
- Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
- Plant Virus Research Studies
- Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
- Plant Molecular Biology Research
-
- Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
- Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
Papers in
-
- Genetics and Plant Breeding 6
- Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology 3
- Plant Molecular Biology Research 1
- Genetics 7
- Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals 7
- Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock 2
- Co-authors
- Xianran Li (5 shared papers)Thomas Lübberstedt (4 shared papers)Tingting Guo (3 shared papers)Jianming Yu (4 shared papers)Hiroyoshi Iwata (1 shared paper)Jinyu Wang (1 shared paper)Candice Gardner (4 shared papers)Qi Mu (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Plant Genome (4 papers)Genome Research (1 paper)Plant Breeding (1 paper)Molecular Plant (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesJapanMexico
In The Last Decade
Adam Vanous
8 papers receiving 235 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 26
- Plant Science 213
- Genetics 158
- Agronomy and Crop Science 24
- Horticulture 2
- Analytical Chemistry 8
Countries citing papers authored by Adam Vanous
This map shows the geographic impact of Adam Vanous's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Adam Vanous with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Adam Vanous more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Adam Vanous
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Adam Vanous. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Adam Vanous. The network helps show where Adam Vanous may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Adam Vanous, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2021 | 78 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 63 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 33 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 22 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 20 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 12 | |
| 7 | 2025 | 5 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 4 |
About Adam Vanous
Adam Vanous is a scholar working on Plant Science, Genetics, Molecular Biology, Agronomy and Crop Science and Infectious Diseases, having authored 8 papers that have together received 237 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals (7 papers), Genetics and Plant Breeding (6 papers), Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology (3 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (2 papers), Plant Reproductive Biology (2 papers), Plant Molecular Biology Research (1 paper), Plant tissue culture and regeneration (1 paper) and Crop Yield and Soil Fertility (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (213 citations), Genetics (158 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (24 citations), Horticulture (2 citations) and Analytical Chemistry (8 citations). Adam Vanous has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Xianran Li, Thomas Lübberstedt, Tingting Guo, Jianming Yu, Hiroyoshi Iwata, Jinyu Wang, Candice Gardner, Qi Mu, Michael Blanco and Akio Onogi. Their work appears in journals such as The Plant Genome, Genome Research, Plant Breeding and Molecular Plant.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.