Adam Field

39 papers receiving 394 citations

Peers

Adam Field
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 247
  • Rehabilitation 40
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 64
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 38
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 16
Replace Carlos Puente with:
Carlos Puente Spain
Esther Morencos Spain
Guilherme Passos Ramos Brazil
Diogo V. Martinho Portugal
Jaime Fernández Fernández Spain
Dan Fransson Sweden
Athanasios Mandroukas Greece
Alejandro Muñoz Spain
Fábio Angioluci Diniz Campos Brazil
Alejandro Rodríguez‐Fernández Spain
Adam Field relative to Carlos Puente Spain Carlos Puente's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Carlos Puente · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Adam Field

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Adam Field's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Adam Field with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Adam Field more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Adam Field

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Adam Field. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Adam Field. The network helps show where Adam Field may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Adam Field, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Adam Field Line = papers co-authored together Adam Field links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202155
2 202238
3 201933
4 202131
5 202230
6 202421
7 202020
8 202213
9 201911
10 202110
11 202110
12 20219
13 20238
14 20208
15 20228
16 20257
17 20227
18 20246
19 20226
20 20236

About Adam Field

Adam Field is a scholar working on Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Cell Biology, Biomedical Engineering and Rehabilitation, having authored 46 papers that have together received 400 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sports Performance and Training (30 papers), Sports injuries and prevention (21 papers), Sport Psychology and Performance (11 papers), Muscle metabolism and nutrition (8 papers), Cardiovascular and exercise physiology (4 papers), Exercise and Physiological Responses (4 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (2 papers) and Physical Education and Training Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (247 citations), Rehabilitation (40 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (64 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (38 citations) and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (16 citations). Adam Field has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Portugal and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Hugo Sarmento, Liam D. Harper, Robert J. Naughton, António J. Figueiredo, Filipe Manuel Clemente, Diogo V. Martinho, Richard Page, Élvio Rúbio Gouveia, Hadi Nobarı and Ana M. Faria. Their work appears in journals such as Biology of Sport, International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism, International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance and International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact