AC Kimber

652 citations
13 papers · 490 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

AC Kimber

13 papers receiving 461 citations

Peers

AC Kimber
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Statistics and Probability 158
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 92
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 74
  • Software 27
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 48
Replace E Günel with:
E Günel United States
Refah Alotaibi Saudi Arabia
I. Smith Australia
Siegfried Schach Germany
David Collins United States
Manoj Kumar Rastogi India
Jianwei Hu China
Olayan Albalawi Saudi Arabia
Sarah LaRocca United States
AC Kimber relative to E Günel United States E Günel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20×24×
E Günel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by AC Kimber

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of AC Kimber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by AC Kimber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites AC Kimber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by AC Kimber

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by AC Kimber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by AC Kimber. The network helps show where AC Kimber may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside AC Kimber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with AC Kimber Line = papers co-authored together AC Kimber links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 1991224
2 200182
3 199762
4 201428
5 199722
6 199518
7 198718
8 199516
9 199311
10 19994
11 19923
12 20001
13
HABITOS ALIMENTICIOS DE UNA MUESTRA DE NINOS MENORES DE 20 MESES EN MADRID
19961

About AC Kimber

AC Kimber is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Mechanics of Materials and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 13 papers that have together received 490 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breastfeeding Practices and Influences (5 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (4 papers), Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (2 papers), X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography (2 papers), Birth, Development, and Health (2 papers), Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications (1 paper), Silicon and Solar Cell Technologies (1 paper) and Engineering Diagnostics and Reliability (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics and Probability (158 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (92 citations), Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (74 citations), Software (27 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (48 citations). AC Kimber has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Spain and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Richard L. Smith, M. J. Crowder, C. Jeynes, Nigel Morgan, R.P. Webb, M. J. Ashwin, PJ Roderick, D. Collett, Natalie Staplin and Jane B. Morgan. Their work appears in journals such as Acta Paediatrica, Journal of Applied Physics, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C (Applied Statistics), Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics and Surface and Interface Analysis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact