A. Thomas Read

2.1k citations
57 papers · 1.5k · h-index 22

Impact in

Papers in

A. Thomas Read

53 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

A. Thomas Read
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Ophthalmology 982
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 393
  • Cell Biology 212
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 131
  • Immunology and Allergy 44
Replace Collin Murphy with:
Collin Murphy United States
Sten Andréasson Sweden
Aaron Nagiel United States
Michael A. Wride Ireland
Giuseppina Raviola United States
Robert Henderson United States
Maria M. van Genderen Netherlands
Bharesh K. Chauhan United States
Karen Grønskov Denmark
Wolf Krebs United States
A. Thomas Read relative to Collin Murphy United States Collin Murphy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.5×
Collin Murphy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by A. Thomas Read

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A. Thomas Read's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. Thomas Read with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. Thomas Read more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by A. Thomas Read

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. Thomas Read. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. Thomas Read. The network helps show where A. Thomas Read may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside A. Thomas Read, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with A. Thomas Read Line = papers co-authored together A. Thomas Read links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004166
2 2016138
3
The pore density in the inner wall endothelium of Schlemm's canal of glaucomatous eyes.
2002101
4 200482
5 201579
6 201667
7 200663
8 201857
9 200656
10 201454
11 200948
12 202144
13 200944
14 201838
15 201438
16 202135
17 198330
18 201030
19 201728
20 202026

About A. Thomas Read

A. Thomas Read is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Molecular Biology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Ecology, having authored 57 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glaucoma and retinal disorders (34 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (13 papers), Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (8 papers), Crustacean biology and ecology (7 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (6 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (5 papers), Corneal Surgery and Treatments (3 papers) and Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (982 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (393 citations), Cell Biology (212 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (131 citations) and Immunology and Allergy (44 citations). A. Thomas Read has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include C. Ross Ethier, Darren Chan, W. Daniel Stamer, Darryl R. Overby, Todd Sulchek, Ke Wang, C. K. Govind, Mark Johnson, D. Brotchie and Peggy E. Hellberg. Their work appears in journals such as Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Experimental Eye Research, Translational Vision Science & Technology, Biological Bulletin and Canadian Journal of Zoology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact