A. Thomas Read

2.1k citations
58 papers · 1.6k · h-index 22

Impact in

Papers in

A. Thomas Read

55 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

A. Thomas Read
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Ophthalmology 1.1k
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 422
  • Cell Biology 231
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 145
  • Neurology 63
Replace H. Barry Collin with:
H. Barry Collin Australia
Giuseppina Raviola United States
Michael A. Wride Ireland
Maria M. van Genderen Netherlands
Gesine Huber Germany
Bharesh K. Chauhan United States
Wolf Krebs United States
Tomohiro Masuda Japan
Tobias Eisenberger Germany
Thomas S. Vihtelic United States
A. Thomas Read relative to H. Barry Collin Australia H. Barry Collin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.7×
H. Barry Collin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by A. Thomas Read

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A. Thomas Read's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. Thomas Read with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. Thomas Read more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by A. Thomas Read

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. Thomas Read. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. Thomas Read. The network helps show where A. Thomas Read may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside A. Thomas Read, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with A. Thomas Read Line = papers co-authored together A. Thomas Read links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004175
2 2016141
3
The pore density in the inner wall endothelium of Schlemm's canal of glaucomatous eyes.
2002114
4 200490
5 201583
6 200671
7 201671
8 200660
9 201860
10 201457
11 200950
12 200948
13 202143
14 201842
15 201441
16 202135
17 201731
18 201030
19 198330
20 201129

About A. Thomas Read

A. Thomas Read is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Ecology and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 58 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glaucoma and retinal disorders (35 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (14 papers), Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (8 papers), Crustacean biology and ecology (7 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (5 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (5 papers), Corneal Surgery and Treatments (4 papers) and Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (1.1k citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (422 citations), Cell Biology (231 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (145 citations) and Neurology (63 citations). A. Thomas Read has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include C. Ross Ethier, Darren W.-H. Chan, William Daniel Stamer, Darryl R. Overby, Todd A. Sulchek, C. K. Govind, Ke Wang, Mark Johnson, Daniel Brotchie and Iok‐Hou Pang. Their work appears in journals such as Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Experimental Eye Research, Translational Vision Science & Technology, Scientific Reports and Biological Bulletin.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact