A. Scott Pearson

31 papers receiving 916 citations

Peers

A. Scott Pearson
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Hepatology 241
  • Oncology 222
  • Cancer Research 94
  • Biotechnology 51
  • Family Practice 10
Replace Autumn Ferguson with:
Autumn Ferguson United States
Sophia Franck Germany
Shiyou Wei China
Bela K. Teleky Austria
Katrien Vekemans Belgium
Tsukasa Aihara Japan
Niloufar Safinia United Kingdom
Andrew Hieu Nguyen United States
Claudia Meier Germany
Kai Feng China
A. Scott Pearson relative to Autumn Ferguson United States Autumn Ferguson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.3×
Autumn Ferguson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by A. Scott Pearson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A. Scott Pearson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. Scott Pearson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. Scott Pearson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by A. Scott Pearson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. Scott Pearson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. Scott Pearson. The network helps show where A. Scott Pearson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside A. Scott Pearson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with A. Scott Pearson Line = papers co-authored together A. Scott Pearson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999303
2 200081
3
Factors limiting adenovirus-mediated gene transfer into human lung and pancreatic cancer cell lines.
199980
4
Up-regulation of the proapoptotic mediators Bax and Bak after adenovirus-mediated p53 gene transfer in lung cancer cells.
200060
5 201950
6 199939
7 201136
8 200833
9 200532
10 200028
11 200628
12 199825
13 199822
14 199821
15 197120
16 201415
17 200315
18 200411
19 200511
20 20117

About A. Scott Pearson

A. Scott Pearson is a scholar working on Oncology, Biotechnology, Cancer Research, Genetics and Surgery, having authored 33 papers that have together received 960 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer Research and Treatments (3 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (3 papers), Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer (3 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (2 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (2 papers), Cancer-related gene regulation (2 papers), Surgical Simulation and Training (2 papers) and Anatomy and Medical Technology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Hepatology (241 citations), Oncology (222 citations), Cancer Research (94 citations), Biotechnology (51 citations) and Family Practice (10 citations). A. Scott Pearson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Steven A. Curley, Paolo Delrio, Lee M. Ellis, Mark S. Roh, Francesco Izzo, John L. Tarpley, Jack A. Roth, Robert Daniel Beauchamp, Martin Tio and Gavin M. Marx. Their work appears in journals such as The American Journal of Surgery, Surgery, Pathology, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment and Supportive Care in Cancer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact