A. Pinho

58 papers receiving 664 citations

Peers

A. Pinho
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • General Dentistry 27
  • Oral Surgery 75
  • Orthodontics 34
  • Geology 34
  • Civil and Structural Engineering 131
Replace Vincenza Anna Maria Luprano with:
Vincenza Anna Maria Luprano Italy
Yasunori Abe Japan
Mircea Cristian Dudescu Romania
Ricardo Cláudio Portugal
Bhanu Pratap India
Arulanantham Brusly Solomon India
Sugiharto Sugiharto Indonesia
Toto Supriyono Indonesia
Paul J. Bills United Kingdom
Jia Yen Huang China
A. Pinho relative to Vincenza Anna Maria Luprano Italy Vincenza Anna Maria Luprano's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×
Vincenza Anna Maria Luprano · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by A. Pinho

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A. Pinho's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. Pinho with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. Pinho more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by A. Pinho

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. Pinho. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. Pinho. The network helps show where A. Pinho may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside A. Pinho, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with A. Pinho Line = papers co-authored together A. Pinho links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 65 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201585
2 201374
3 201053
4 201351
5 202250
6 200344
7 200833
8 200631
9 200924
10 200520
11 200617
12 201915
13 201314
14 201713
15 200712
16 201411
17 201710
18 20059
19 20129
20 20149

About A. Pinho

A. Pinho is a scholar working on Mechanical Engineering, Geology, Mechanics of Materials, Surgery and Civil and Structural Engineering, having authored 65 papers that have together received 693 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pectus Deformity Diagnosis and Treatment (10 papers), Cellular and Composite Structures (7 papers), 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage (6 papers), Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques (6 papers), High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior (5 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (5 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (5 papers) and Metal Forming Simulation Techniques (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Dentistry (27 citations), Oral Surgery (75 citations), Orthodontics (34 citations), Geology (34 citations) and Civil and Structural Engineering (131 citations). A. Pinho has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, Brazil and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Jaime Carmona Fonseca, João L. Vilaça, Nuno R. M. Peixinho, Nuno F. Rodrigues, Jorge Correia‐Pinto, Norman Jones, António H. J. Moreira, Ana I. Neto, Elisabete F. Freitas and João Filipe Mano. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Pediatric Surgery, Cadernos de Saúde Pública, Medical Physics, Mechatronics and Optics & Laser Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact