A. Peper

32 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

A. Peper
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 572
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 372
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 378
  • Biomedical Engineering 619
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 85
Replace A.C. Metting van Rijn with:
A.C. Metting van Rijn Netherlands
Bernard Grundlehner Netherlands
Kwang Suk Park South Korea
Yu Mike United States
Evelien Carrette Belgium
Sarah Power Canada
Thomas C. Ferrée United States
Jean Delbeke Belgium
Patrícia Figueiredo Portugal
Jee Hyun Choi South Korea
A. Peper relative to A.C. Metting van Rijn Netherlands A.C. Metting van Rijn's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.7×
A.C. Metting van Rijn · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by A. Peper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A. Peper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. Peper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. Peper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by A. Peper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. Peper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. Peper. The network helps show where A. Peper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside A. Peper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with A. Peper Line = papers co-authored together A. Peper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1991381
2 1990356
3 2002270
4 199455
5 199848
6 199136
7 200930
8 199429
9 198426
10 200423
11 198717
12 198514
13 198813
14 200912
15 200412
16 198310
17 19827
18 19926
19 19896
20 19925

About A. Peper

A. Peper is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Biomedical Engineering, Cognitive Neuroscience and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 36 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include ECG Monitoring and Analysis (11 papers), Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design (5 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (5 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (5 papers), Sensor Technology and Measurement Systems (5 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (5 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (4 papers) and Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (572 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (372 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (378 citations), Biomedical Engineering (619 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (85 citations). A. Peper has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Germany and Romania. Frequent co-authors include C.A. Grimbergen, A.C. Metting van Rijn, E. Huigen, Roeland Van Wijk, J. E. M. Souren, R. Jonges, André C. Linnenbank, A. SippensGroenewegen, Gert Jan Scheffer and H. H. Ros. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, Journal of Theoretical Biology, Communicative & Integrative Biology, International Journal of Hyperthermia and Dose-Response.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact