A Digito

670 citations
10 papers · 378 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

A Digito

10 papers receiving 361 citations

Peers

A Digito
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Nephrology 141
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 91
  • Emergency Medical Services 72
  • Epidemiology 145
  • Emergency Medicine 28
Replace John H. Reeves with:
John H. Reeves Australia
Ranistha Ratanarat Thailand
Marco Pozzato Italy
A.W. Holt Australia
Rogério da Hora Passos Brazil
Matthieu Le Dorze France
Sergio Vesconi Italy
Renee A. Higgerson United States
Jean-Christophe Farkas France
Stefaan Claus Belgium
A Digito relative to John H. Reeves Australia John H. Reeves's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
John H. Reeves · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by A Digito

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A Digito's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A Digito with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A Digito more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by A Digito

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by A Digito. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A Digito. The network helps show where A Digito may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside A Digito, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with A Digito Line = papers co-authored together A Digito links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 2002245
2 200372
3 199933
4
Achievements and new directions in continuous renal replacement therapies.
199511
5 20019
6
Present and future options in continuous renal replacement therapies of sepsis and MOF.
19994
7 19991
8
Continuous renal replacement therapy in patients with HELLP syndrome.
19991
9
[Beriberi during parenteral feeding].
19881
10
Results from ethical international surveys on the management of the continuous renal replacement therapy.
19991

About A Digito

A Digito is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Nephrology, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Immunology and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 10 papers that have together received 378 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (4 papers), Acute Kidney Injury Research (3 papers), Immune Response and Inflammation (2 papers), Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications (1 paper), Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (1 paper), Nosocomial Infections in ICU (1 paper), Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis (1 paper) and Liver Diseases and Immunity (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nephrology (141 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (91 citations), Emergency Medical Services (72 citations), Epidemiology (145 citations) and Emergency Medicine (28 citations). A Digito has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Switzerland and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Claudio Ronco, Pasquale Piccinni, M Irone, Ciro Tetta, Rinaldo Bellomo, Alessandra Brendolan, Maurizio Dan, Gerhard Lonnemann, Giuseppe La Greca and Paola Inguaggiato. Their work appears in journals such as Critical Care Medicine, Kidney International, Contributions to nephrology and PubMed.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact