A. Chabert

27 papers receiving 402 citations

Peers

A. Chabert
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Hematology 127
  • Internal Medicine 25
  • Neurology 37
  • Immunology 68
  • Biochemistry 17
Replace Todd Archer with:
Todd Archer United States
Cha Han China
Jack Guida United States
Masayoshi Kobayashi Japan
Wallace H. Coulter United States
P. Ostendorf Germany
Keiko Kawakami Japan
Francesca Taverna Italy
Rosario Alende Spain
Sotiria Tzima Greece
A. Chabert relative to Todd Archer United States Todd Archer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.3×
Todd Archer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by A. Chabert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A. Chabert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. Chabert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. Chabert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by A. Chabert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. Chabert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. Chabert. The network helps show where A. Chabert may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside A. Chabert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with A. Chabert Line = papers co-authored together A. Chabert links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015180
2 200494
3 201557
4 201413
5 200113
6 201710
7 19999
8 20176
9 20135
10 19794
11 19914
12 19753
13 19943
14 19973
15 19792
16 19732
17
THE INTERDIGITAL H-TYPE (IH) STRUCTURE, AN ACCELERATING STRUCTURE FOR LOW ENERGY BEAMS.
19702
18 20172
19
Main results of the SSC's magnetic field mapping at GANIL
19822
20 20251

About A. Chabert

A. Chabert is a scholar working on Aerospace Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Radiation, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Hematology, having authored 33 papers that have together received 423 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (16 papers), Particle Accelerators and Free-Electron Lasers (7 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (6 papers), Platelet Disorders and Treatments (5 papers), Magnetic confinement fusion research (5 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (4 papers), Ion-surface interactions and analysis (3 papers) and Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Hematology (127 citations), Internal Medicine (25 citations), Neurology (37 citations), Immunology (68 citations) and Biochemistry (17 citations). A. Chabert has collaborated with scholars based in France, Switzerland and Argentina. Frequent co-authors include Olivier Garraud, Hind Hamzeh‐Cognasse, Fabrice Cognasse, Bruno Pozzetto, Pauline Damien, Mirta Schattner, Ricardo M. Gómez, N. Costedoat‐Chalumeau, Pierre Ferré and Hubert Laude. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment, BMC Immunology, Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis and Nature Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact