A. C. Ewing

645 citations
28 papers · 70 · h-index 5

Impact in

  • Philosophy top 10%
    • Philosophical Ethics and Theory
    • Theology and Philosophy of Evil
    • Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics

Papers in

A. C. Ewing

22 papers receiving 46 citations

Peers

A. C. Ewing
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
  • Philosophy 27
  • General Psychology 3
  • History and Philosophy of Science 4
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 9
  • General Social Sciences 2
Replace Arthur Ε. Murphy with:
Arthur Ε. Murphy United States
Frederick C. Dommeyer United States
Lily B. Campbell United States
Van Wyck Brooks
Kwong-Loi Shun United States
Max Schoen United States
Leo R. Ward United States
Ivan Soll United States
Mark Collier United States
Johann Caspar Lavater
A. C. Ewing relative to Arthur Ε. Murphy United States Arthur Ε. Murphy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Arthur Ε. Murphy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by A. C. Ewing

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A. C. Ewing's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. C. Ewing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. C. Ewing more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by A. C. Ewing

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. C. Ewing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. C. Ewing. The network helps show where A. C. Ewing may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside A. C. Ewing, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with A. C. Ewing Line = papers co-authored together A. C. Ewing links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 195812
2 195311
3 195310
4 19654
5 19634
6 19524
7 19763
8
The Justification of Emotions
19573
9 19712
10
The Idealist Tradition
19592
11
The Morality of Punishment : With Some Suggestions for a General Theory of Ethics
20122
12 20132
13 19541
14 19571
15 19511
16 19571
17 19731
18 19641
19 19651
20 20131

About A. C. Ewing

A. C. Ewing is a scholar working on Philosophy, Political Science and International Relations, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Religious studies and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 28 papers that have together received 70 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophical Ethics and Theory (4 papers), Theology and Philosophy of Evil (4 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (3 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (2 papers), Karl Barth and Christian Theology (1 paper), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (1 paper), Political Philosophy and Ethics (1 paper) and Classical Philosophy and Thought (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (27 citations), General Psychology (3 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (4 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (9 citations) and General Social Sciences (2 citations). A. C. Ewing has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include A. D. Woozley, Albert Lévi, John Hospers, W. D. Hudson, Mary Warnock, Telliyavaram Mahadevan Ponnambalam Mahadevan, Paul Arthur Schilpp, Michael Tooley and Charles A. Moore. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy, The Philosophical Quarterly, The Philosophical Review, Mind and Religious Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact