Nurse Prescribing

660 papers and 1.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 660 papers published in Nurse Prescribing in the last decades have received a total of 1.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Nurse Prescribing usually cover General Health Professions (196 papers), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (88 papers) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (87 papers) specifically the topics of Nursing Roles and Practices (129 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (67 papers) and Pharmaceutical studies and practices (54 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Nurse Prescribing are Molly Courtenay, Richard Griffith, Mark Greener, Linda Nazarko, Steve Hemingway, Anthony Harrison, Austyn Snowden, Deborah Robertson, Nicola Carey and Karen Stenner.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Nurse Prescribing

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Nurse Prescribing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Nurse Prescribing.

Countries where authors publish in Nurse Prescribing

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Nurse Prescribing. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Nurse Prescribing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nurse Prescribing more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025