Countries where authors publish in Veterinary Record Open
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Veterinary Record Open. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Veterinary Record Open with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Veterinary Record Open more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Veterinary Record Open
This network shows the impact of papers published in Veterinary Record Open. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Veterinary Record Open.
About Veterinary Record Open
The 256 papers published in Veterinary Record Open in the last decades have received a total of 2.3k indexed citations . Papers published in Veterinary Record Open usually cover Equine (14 papers), Small Animals (53 papers), Speech and Hearing (15 papers), Agronomy and Crop Science (24 papers) and Microbiology (13 papers) specifically the topics of Veterinary Practice and Education Studies (15 papers), Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (15 papers), Veterinary Equine Medical Research (14 papers), Helminth infection and control (10 papers), Microbial infections and disease research (10 papers), Animal health and immunology (9 papers), Human-Animal Interaction Studies (9 papers) and Vector-Borne Animal Diseases (9 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Veterinary Record Open are Miguel Á. Moreno, Robert Goggs, Heather Bacon, Catherine M Dwyer, Fiona C. Rioja-Lang, Melanie Connor, W. Heuwieser, Carola Fischer‐Tenhagen, Emma K. Grigg and Rachael Tarlinton.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.