Clinical techniques in equine practice

210 papers and 2.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 210 papers published in Clinical techniques in equine practice in the last decades have received a total of 2.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Clinical techniques in equine practice usually cover Equine (123 papers), Small Animals (55 papers) and Surgery (42 papers) specifically the topics of Veterinary Equine Medical Research (123 papers), Tendon Structure and Treatment (26 papers) and Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia (23 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Clinical techniques in equine practice are Sue Dyson, Derek C. Knottenbelt, Christopher C. Pollitt, Leonardo F.C. Brito, Susan M. Stover, P. René van Weeren, Ted S. Stashak, Rachel C. Murray, Bernd Driessen and Regina M. Turner.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Clinical techniques in equine practice

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Clinical techniques in equine practice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Clinical techniques in equine practice.

Countries where authors publish in Clinical techniques in equine practice

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Clinical techniques in equine practice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Clinical techniques in equine practice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clinical techniques in equine practice more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025