Vernacular Architecture

431 papers and 954 indexed citations i.

About

The 431 papers published in Vernacular Architecture in the last decades have received a total of 954 indexed citations. Papers published in Vernacular Architecture usually cover History (143 papers), Archeology (98 papers) and Atmospheric Science (37 papers) specifically the topics of Historical Architecture and Urbanism (89 papers), Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation (35 papers) and Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (32 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Vernacular Architecture are Daniel Miles, Christopher Dyer, Alex Bayliss, N. W. Alcock, John Walker, Martin Bridge, Sarah Pearson, Richard Harris, Oliver Rackham and Arnold Pacey.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Vernacular Architecture

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Vernacular Architecture. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Vernacular Architecture.

Countries where authors publish in Vernacular Architecture

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Vernacular Architecture. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Vernacular Architecture with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Vernacular Architecture more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025