Countries where authors publish in Updates in Surgery
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Updates in Surgery. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Updates in Surgery with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Updates in Surgery more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Updates in Surgery. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Updates in Surgery.
About Updates in Surgery
The 1.8k papers published in Updates in Surgery in the last decades have received a total of 14.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Updates in Surgery usually cover Surgery (1.4k papers), Gastroenterology (132 papers), Oncology (622 papers), Hepatology (175 papers) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (603 papers) specifically the topics of Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (289 papers), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (233 papers), Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (220 papers), Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders (173 papers), Esophageal and GI Pathology (145 papers), Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis (124 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (122 papers) and Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies (122 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Updates in Surgery are Antonio Biondi, Salvatore Giovanni Vitale, Francesco Corcione, Georgios D. Lianos, Alessandro Tropea, Felice Pirozzi, Pasqualino Favoriti, Gabriele Carbone, Raffaele Pirozzi and Marco Greco.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.