Countries where authors publish in ACM Transactions on the Web
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in ACM Transactions on the Web. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in ACM Transactions on the Web with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites ACM Transactions on the Web more than expected).
Fields of papers published in ACM Transactions on the Web
This network shows the impact of papers published in ACM Transactions on the Web. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in ACM Transactions on the Web.
About ACM Transactions on the Web
The 464 papers published in ACM Transactions on the Web in the last decades have received a total of 13.8k indexed citations . Papers published in ACM Transactions on the Web usually cover Information Systems (266 papers), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (86 papers), Artificial Intelligence (228 papers), Computer Networks and Communications (113 papers) and Signal Processing (53 papers) specifically the topics of Complex Network Analysis Techniques (83 papers), Web Data Mining and Analysis (79 papers), Spam and Phishing Detection (73 papers), Recommender Systems and Techniques (62 papers), Caching and Content Delivery (53 papers), Advanced Graph Neural Networks (47 papers), Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services (46 papers) and Topic Modeling (40 papers). The most active scholars publishing in ACM Transactions on the Web are Lada A. Adamic, Jure Leskovec, Bernardo A. Hubermann, Tao Yu, Yue Zhang, Kwei-Jay Lin, Jennifer Golbeck, Xing Xie, Wei-Ying Ma and Yu Zheng.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.