The Knowledge Engineering Review

28.3k citations
775 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • Semantic Web and Ontologies
    • Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
    • Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
    • AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
    • Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services

Papers in

    • AI-based Problem Solving and Planning 186
    • Semantic Web and Ontologies 172
    • Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge 130
    • Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation 128

The Knowledge Engineering Review

706 papers receiving 24.1k citations

Peers

The Knowledge Engineering Review
Comparison fields: 5 of 222
  • Artificial Intelligence 17.0k
  • Information Systems 7.2k
  • Management Information Systems 2.8k
  • Management Science and Operations Research 3.0k
  • Computer Networks and Communications 5.2k
Replace Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems with:
Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems United States
Journal of Web Semantics Germany
Computer Science Review India
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery United States
ACM Transactions on Internet Technology United States
Human-Computer Interaction United States
IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine China
ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction United States
Evolutionary Computation United States
AI Communications Spain
The Knowledge Engineering Review relative to Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems United States Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in The Knowledge Engineering Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Knowledge Engineering Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Knowledge Engineering Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Knowledge Engineering Review more than expected).

Fields of papers published in The Knowledge Engineering Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Knowledge Engineering Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Knowledge Engineering Review.

About The Knowledge Engineering Review

The 775 papers published in The Knowledge Engineering Review in the last decades have received a total of 28.3k indexed citations . Papers published in The Knowledge Engineering Review usually cover Artificial Intelligence (524 papers), Software (35 papers), Information Systems (190 papers), Computer Networks and Communications (166 papers) and Management Science and Operations Research (75 papers) specifically the topics of AI-based Problem Solving and Planning (186 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (172 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (130 papers), Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation (128 papers), Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services (81 papers), Constraint Satisfaction and Optimization (53 papers), Advanced Database Systems and Queries (37 papers) and Business Process Modeling and Analysis (32 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Knowledge Engineering Review are Nicholas R. Jennings, Michael Wooldridge, Simon Parsons, Mike Uschold, Michael Grüninger, Hyacinth S. Nwana, Ian Watson, Yannis Kalfoglou, Marco Schorlemmer and Farhi Marir.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact