Tropical Plant Pathology

1.1k papers and 10.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.1k papers published in Tropical Plant Pathology in the last decades have received a total of 10.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Tropical Plant Pathology usually cover Plant Science (1.0k papers), Cell Biology (389 papers) and Molecular Biology (172 papers) specifically the topics of Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (389 papers), Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies (226 papers) and Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity (218 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Tropical Plant Pathology are Laércio Zambolim, Marciel J. Stadnik, Barbara Valent, Emerson M. Del Ponte, Fabrício Ávila Rodrigues, Fabrício Ávila Rodrigues, Changyong Zhou, Jayme Garcia Arnal Barbedo, Mateus B. de Freitas and W. Bettiol.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Tropical Plant Pathology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Tropical Plant Pathology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Tropical Plant Pathology.

Countries where authors publish in Tropical Plant Pathology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Tropical Plant Pathology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Tropical Plant Pathology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tropical Plant Pathology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025