Tree Genetics & Genomes

1.6k papers and 35.5k indexed citations

About

The 1.6k papers published in Tree Genetics & Genomes in the last decades have received a total of 35.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Tree Genetics & Genomes usually cover Plant Science (975 papers), Molecular Biology (673 papers) and Genetics (558 papers) specifically the topics of Genetic diversity and population structure (431 papers), Horticultural and Viticultural Research (240 papers) and Plant Reproductive Biology (225 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Tree Genetics & Genomes are BM Potts, Dário Grattapaglia, Marcos Deon Vilela de Resende, René E. Vaillancourt, David B. Neale, Andrew J. Eckert, Outi Savolainen, Albert G. Abbott, David Chagné and Fabrizio Costa.

In The Last Decade

Tree Genetics & Genomes

1.6k papers receiving 34.3k citations

Fields of papers published in Tree Genetics & Genomes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Tree Genetics & Genomes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Tree Genetics & Genomes.

Countries where authors publish in Tree Genetics & Genomes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Tree Genetics & Genomes. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Tree Genetics & Genomes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tree Genetics & Genomes more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026