Trends in Environmental Analytical Chemistry

11.1k citations
283 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

Papers in

Trends in Environmental Analytical Chemistry

271 papers receiving 11.0k citations

Peers

Trends in Environmental Analytical Chemistry
Comparison fields: 5 of 177
  • Analytical Chemistry 2.5k
  • Electrochemistry 1.3k
  • Pollution 2.4k
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 2.1k
  • Bioengineering 796
Replace Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology C Photochemistry Reviews with:
Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology C Photochemistry Reviews Japan
Separation and Purification Reviews India
Advances in Environmental Research United States
Analytical Communications United States
Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part C United States
Current Pollution Reports China
Advances in microbial physiology United Kingdom
Reviews in Analytical Chemistry China
Annual Review of Analytical Chemistry United States
Water Resources and Industry Poland
Trends in Environmental Analytical Chemistry relative to Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology C Photochemistry Reviews Japan Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology C Photochemistry Reviews's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.9×
Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology C Photochemistry Reviews · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Trends in Environmental Analytical Chemistry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Trends in Environmental Analytical Chemistry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Trends in Environmental Analytical Chemistry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Trends in Environmental Analytical Chemistry more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Trends in Environmental Analytical Chemistry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Trends in Environmental Analytical Chemistry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Trends in Environmental Analytical Chemistry.

About Trends in Environmental Analytical Chemistry

The 283 papers published in Trends in Environmental Analytical Chemistry in the last decades have received a total of 11.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Trends in Environmental Analytical Chemistry usually cover Analytical Chemistry (90 papers), Electrochemistry (44 papers), Pollution (71 papers), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (69 papers) and Bioengineering (27 papers) specifically the topics of Analytical chemistry methods development (74 papers), Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (44 papers), Electrochemical sensors and biosensors (40 papers), Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts (31 papers), Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (30 papers), Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact (27 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Sensors (27 papers) and Microplastics and Plastic Pollution (25 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Trends in Environmental Analytical Chemistry are Tawfik A. Saleh, Govindhan Maduraiveeran, Wei Jin, Muhammad Sajid, J. E. Thompson, Suresh Kumar Kailasa, Xiangru Zhang, Janardhan Reddy Koduru, E. Michael Thurman and Imma Ferrer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact