Theory and Practice in Language Studies

15.5k citations
3.1k papers · · active since 2009

Impact in

Papers in

    • EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning 1.2k
    • Translation Studies and Practices 331
    • Linguistics and Language Analysis 146
    • Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies 103
    • Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation 101

Theory and Practice in Language Studies

2.4k papers receiving 13.7k citations

Peers

Theory and Practice in Language Studies
Comparison fields: 5 of 147
  • Language and Linguistics 7.4k
  • Linguistics and Language 961
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 2.1k
  • Education 3k
  • Literature and Literary Theory 1.5k
Replace Journal of Language Teaching and Research with:
Journal of Language Teaching and Research China
English Language Teaching China
Cogent Education Indonesia
Hispania United States
Asian Social Science Malaysia
Semiotica United States
Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy United States
The Qualitative Report United States
The Slavic and East European Journal United States
European Journal of Education China
Theory and Practice in Language Studies relative to Journal of Language Teaching and Research China Journal of Language Teaching and Research's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Journal of Language Teaching and Research · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Theory and Practice in Language Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Theory and Practice in Language Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Theory and Practice in Language Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Theory and Practice in Language Studies more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Theory and Practice in Language Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Theory and Practice in Language Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Theory and Practice in Language Studies.

About Theory and Practice in Language Studies

The 3.1k papers published in Theory and Practice in Language Studies in the last decades have received a total of 15.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Theory and Practice in Language Studies usually cover Language and Linguistics (1.9k papers), Linguistics and Language (236 papers), Literature and Literary Theory (551 papers), Developmental and Educational Psychology (409 papers) and Information Systems (252 papers) specifically the topics of EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (1.2k papers), Translation Studies and Practices (331 papers), Second Language Acquisition and Learning (291 papers), Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (206 papers), English Language Learning and Teaching (201 papers), Linguistics and Language Analysis (146 papers), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (103 papers) and Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (101 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Theory and Practice in Language Studies are Mohammad Zohrabi, Ali Akbar Khansir, Farahman Farrokhi, Abbas Pourhosein Gilakjani, Burhanuddin Arafah, Lưu Trọng Tuấn, Ali Derakhshan, Hossein Bozorgian, Saeed Ketabi and Ming Liu.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact