Theoretical Population Biology

122.0k citations
2.5k papers · · active since 2016

Impact in

Papers in

Theoretical Population Biology

2.5k papers receiving 109.2k citations

Peers

Theoretical Population Biology
Comparison fields: 5 of 233
  • Genetics 55.9k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 22.3k
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 30.7k
  • Modeling and Simulation 5.6k
  • Ecology 27.0k
Replace Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology) with:
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology) United States
Nature Reviews Genetics United States
Nature Ecology & Evolution United States
BioEssays United States
Biology Letters United States
Mathematical Biosciences United States
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology United States
BMC Evolutionary Biology United States
Evolutionary Applications United States
Evolutionary Ecology United States
Theoretical Population Biology relative to Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology) United States Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology)'s profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.8×
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology) · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Theoretical Population Biology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Theoretical Population Biology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Theoretical Population Biology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Theoretical Population Biology more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Theoretical Population Biology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Theoretical Population Biology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Theoretical Population Biology.

About Theoretical Population Biology

The 2.5k papers published in Theoretical Population Biology in the last decades have received a total of 122.0k indexed citations . Papers published in Theoretical Population Biology usually cover Genetics (1.7k papers), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (860 papers), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (519 papers), Modeling and Simulation (111 papers) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (297 papers) specifically the topics of Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (1.4k papers), Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models (840 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (693 papers), Plant and animal studies (435 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (337 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (275 papers), Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals (271 papers) and Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (230 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Theoretical Population Biology are Eric L. Charnov, G. A. Watterson, Robert Douglas Holt, Peter Chesson, Warren J. Ewens, Marcus W. Feldman, Alan M. Hastings, C. Radhakrishna Rao, Michael Turelli and Simon A. Levin.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact