Nova Hedwigia

2.1k papers and 19.4k indexed citations

About

The 2.1k papers published in Nova Hedwigia in the last decades have received a total of 19.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Nova Hedwigia usually cover Plant Science (1.2k papers), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (1.0k papers) and Cell Biology (532 papers) specifically the topics of Lichen and fungal ecology (662 papers), Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (596 papers) and Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (544 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Nova Hedwigia are Rasoul Zare, W. Gams, André Aptroot, Harald Kürschner, B. van Geel, R. L. Seymour, W. B. Kendrick, Wolfgang Frey, Carol A. Shearer and Michael Stech.

In The Last Decade

Nova Hedwigia

1.9k papers receiving 16.9k citations

Fields of papers published in Nova Hedwigia

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Nova Hedwigia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Nova Hedwigia.

Countries where authors publish in Nova Hedwigia

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Nova Hedwigia. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Nova Hedwigia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nova Hedwigia more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026