The Horticulture Journal

503 papers and 3.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 503 papers published in The Horticulture Journal in the last decades have received a total of 3.1k indexed citations. Papers published in The Horticulture Journal usually cover Plant Science (444 papers), Molecular Biology (206 papers) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (60 papers) specifically the topics of Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (204 papers), Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management (118 papers) and Horticultural and Viticultural Research (95 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Horticulture Journal are Yoshinori Kanayama, Akifumi Azuma, Shigeki Moriya, C. Honda, Ryutaro Tao, Sota Koeda, Takeshi Kurokura, Masafumi Yagi, Masumi Yamagishi and Tadahisa Higashide.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The Horticulture Journal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Horticulture Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Horticulture Journal.

Countries where authors publish in The Horticulture Journal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Horticulture Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Horticulture Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Horticulture Journal more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025