The F Scott Fitzgerald Review

204 papers and 182 indexed citations i.

About

The 204 papers published in The F Scott Fitzgerald Review in the last decades have received a total of 182 indexed citations. Papers published in The F Scott Fitzgerald Review usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (187 papers), History (144 papers) and Philosophy (11 papers) specifically the topics of American and British Literature Analysis (184 papers), American Literature and Culture (139 papers) and Literature, Film, and Journalism Analysis (77 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The F Scott Fitzgerald Review are Ronald Berman, James L. W. West, Scott Donaldson, C. Messenger, F. Scott Fitzgerald, Kevin R. Ford, John F. Callahan, Peter L. Hays, J. Gerald Kennedy and Sharon Kim.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The F Scott Fitzgerald Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The F Scott Fitzgerald Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The F Scott Fitzgerald Review.

Countries where authors publish in The F Scott Fitzgerald Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The F Scott Fitzgerald Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The F Scott Fitzgerald Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The F Scott Fitzgerald Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025