Anesthesia Progress

545 papers and 6.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 545 papers published in Anesthesia Progress in the last decades have received a total of 6.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Anesthesia Progress usually cover Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (308 papers), Surgery (173 papers) and Oral Surgery (150 papers) specifically the topics of Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (205 papers), Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques (148 papers) and Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (131 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Anesthesia Progress are Daniel E. Becker, Morton Rosenberg, Kenneth L. Reed, Daniel A. Haas, Joseph A. Giovannitti, James J. Crawford, Raymond M. Quock, Dimitris Emmanouil, M Kudo and Al Reader.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Anesthesia Progress

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Anesthesia Progress. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Anesthesia Progress.

Countries where authors publish in Anesthesia Progress

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Anesthesia Progress. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Anesthesia Progress with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anesthesia Progress more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025