The Arkansas Historical Quarterly

987 papers and 4.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 987 papers published in The Arkansas Historical Quarterly in the last decades have received a total of 4.7k indexed citations. Papers published in The Arkansas Historical Quarterly usually cover Sociology and Political Science (382 papers), Marketing (263 papers) and Anthropology (249 papers) specifically the topics of Race, History, and American Society (278 papers), American History and Culture (263 papers) and Archaeology and Natural History (204 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Arkansas Historical Quarterly are Willard B. Gatewood, George M. Fredrickson, Elliott West, John Barry, Nelson Lichtenstein, John W. Graves, Lawrence Goodwyn, James F. Brooks, George Sabo and Stanley L. Engerman.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The Arkansas Historical Quarterly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Arkansas Historical Quarterly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Arkansas Historical Quarterly.

Countries where authors publish in The Arkansas Historical Quarterly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Arkansas Historical Quarterly. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Arkansas Historical Quarterly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Arkansas Historical Quarterly more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025