Nineteenth-century French studies

273 papers and 173 indexed citations i.

About

The 273 papers published in Nineteenth-century French studies in the last decades have received a total of 173 indexed citations. Papers published in Nineteenth-century French studies usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (183 papers), Anthropology (62 papers) and History and Philosophy of Science (53 papers) specifically the topics of French Literature and Poetry (104 papers), French Literature and Criticism (75 papers) and Literature and Culture Studies (51 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Nineteenth-century French studies are Michael R. Finn, Ross Chambers, Robert St. Clair, Rosemary Lloyd, Dorothy Kelly, William D. Paulson, Graham Harman, Philippe Willems, Martin Jay and Yves Laberge.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Nineteenth-century French studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Nineteenth-century French studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Nineteenth-century French studies.

Countries where authors publish in Nineteenth-century French studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Nineteenth-century French studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Nineteenth-century French studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nineteenth-century French studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025