Twentieth-Century China

295 papers and 499 indexed citations i.

About

The 295 papers published in Twentieth-Century China in the last decades have received a total of 499 indexed citations. Papers published in Twentieth-Century China usually cover Sociology and Political Science (250 papers), Cultural Studies (89 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (46 papers) specifically the topics of Chinese history and philosophy (215 papers), Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (96 papers) and Japanese History and Culture (80 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Twentieth-Century China are Nicolai Volland, Paul A. Cohen, Gardner Bovingdon, Jie Li, Louise Edwards, Cohen, Dan Shao, Joseph W. Esherick, Charles D. Musgrove and Wu Guo.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Twentieth-Century China

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Twentieth-Century China. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Twentieth-Century China.

Countries where authors publish in Twentieth-Century China

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Twentieth-Century China. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Twentieth-Century China with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Twentieth-Century China more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025