Countries where authors publish in Textile Progress
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Textile Progress. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Textile Progress with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Textile Progress more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Textile Progress. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Textile Progress.
About Textile Progress
The 205 papers published in Textile Progress in the last decades have received a total of 5.6k indexed citations . Papers published in Textile Progress usually cover Polymers and Plastics (97 papers), Museology (21 papers), Building and Construction (32 papers), Nuclear Energy and Engineering (1 paper) and Automotive Engineering (21 papers) specifically the topics of Textile materials and evaluations (79 papers), Dyeing and Modifying Textile Fibers (29 papers), Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies (20 papers), Fashion and Cultural Textiles (18 papers), Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials (16 papers), Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications (12 papers), Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites (11 papers) and Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection (11 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Textile Progress are K. Slater, A. Barella, David Bishop, Asim Kumar Roy Choudhury, S. N. Pandey, Amitava Bhattacharyya, A. Mukhopadhyay, Mangala Joshi, R. Alagirusamy and Simeon Gill.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.