Technoetic Arts

269 papers and 455 indexed citations i.

About

The 269 papers published in Technoetic Arts in the last decades have received a total of 455 indexed citations. Papers published in Technoetic Arts usually cover Cognitive Neuroscience (51 papers), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (41 papers) and Human-Computer Interaction (39 papers) specifically the topics of Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (26 papers), Art, Technology, and Culture (22 papers) and Architecture and Computational Design (17 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Technoetic Arts are Christine Noweski, Christoph Meinel, Donna Cox, James K. Gimzewski, David McConville, Martin M. Hanczyc, Takashi Ikegami, Mark A. Bedau, Ana Viseu and Ionat Zurr.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Technoetic Arts

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Technoetic Arts. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Technoetic Arts.

Countries where authors publish in Technoetic Arts

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Technoetic Arts. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Technoetic Arts with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Technoetic Arts more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025