Technical Communication

216 papers and 1.9k indexed citations

About

The 216 papers published in Technical Communication in the last decades have received a total of 1.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Technical Communication usually cover Sociology and Political Science (30 papers), Human-Computer Interaction (30 papers) and Information Systems (26 papers) specifically the topics of Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (18 papers), Usability and User Interface Design (14 papers) and Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (13 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Technical Communication are Clay Spinuzzi, E. Brumberger, Jan H. Spyridakis, Hans van der Meij, Menno D.T. de Jong, Jo Mackiewicz, M.F. Steehouder, Claire Lauer, Thea van der Geest and Michael Alley.

In The Last Decade

Technical Communication

130 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Fields of papers published in Technical Communication

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Technical Communication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Technical Communication.

Countries where authors publish in Technical Communication

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Technical Communication. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Technical Communication with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Technical Communication more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026