Surgical pathology clinics

697 papers and 5.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 697 papers published in Surgical pathology clinics in the last decades have received a total of 5.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Surgical pathology clinics usually cover Surgery (222 papers), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (208 papers) and Oncology (206 papers) specifically the topics of Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (96 papers), Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (51 papers) and Bone Tumor Diagnosis and Treatments (45 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Surgical pathology clinics are W. Patrick Devine, Roberto Ruiz‐Cordero, Alyssa M. Krasinskas, C. Angela, Brad W. Neville, Raja R. Seethala, Lester D.�R. Thompson, Bin Xu, Werner Kempf and Bobby Collins.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Surgical pathology clinics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Surgical pathology clinics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Surgical pathology clinics.

Countries where authors publish in Surgical pathology clinics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Surgical pathology clinics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Surgical pathology clinics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Surgical pathology clinics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025