Richard W. Bulliet

62 papers receiving 784 citations

Peers

Richard W. Bulliet
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
  • Anthropology 273
  • Political Science and International Relations 574
  • Classics 75
  • Archeology 196
  • Religious studies 81
Replace S. D. Goıteın with:
S. D. Goıteın United States
İra M. Lapıdus United States
Keith Hopkins United Kingdom
Suraiya Faroqhi Türkiye
Brent D. Shaw United States
Mogens Herman Hansen Denmark
S. C. Humphreys United States
Richard N. Frye United States
Robin Osborne United Kingdom
Martin Bernal United States
Richard W. Bulliet relative to S. D. Goıteın United States S. D. Goıteın's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
S. D. Goıteın · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Richard W. Bulliet

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard W. Bulliet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard W. Bulliet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard W. Bulliet more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard W. Bulliet

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard W. Bulliet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard W. Bulliet. The network helps show where Richard W. Bulliet may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Richard W. Bulliet, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Richard W. Bulliet Line = papers co-authored together Richard W. Bulliet links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 69 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1978183
2 1978138
3 197998
4 199790
5 198380
6 200568
7 198365
8 198262
9 197342
10 199428
11 199727
12
The Earth and Its Peoples: A Global History
199721
13 199118
14
Views from the edge : essays in honor of Richard W. Bulliet
200415
15 198815
16 197013
17
Encyclopedia of Asian History
198712
18 199012
19 199510
20 198210

About Richard W. Bulliet

Richard W. Bulliet is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Anthropology, Education and Archeology, having authored 69 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Islamic Studies and History (28 papers), Eurasian Exchange Networks (16 papers), Education and Islamic Studies (11 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (9 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (9 papers), Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East (6 papers), Byzantine Studies and History (6 papers) and Islamic Finance and Banking Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (273 citations), Political Science and International Relations (574 citations), Classics (75 citations), Archeology (196 citations) and Religious studies (81 citations). Richard W. Bulliet has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Marshall G. S. Hodgson, Peter von Sivers, Cemal Kafadar, L. Carl Brown, Bernard Lewıs, Andrew C. Hess, Gavin R. G. Hambly, Robert J. Allison, Fred R. von der Mehden and Janet Abu‐Lughod. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient, International Journal Middle East Studies, The Journal of Interdisciplinary History and Foreign Affairs.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact