Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy Review

927 papers and 15.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 927 papers published in Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy Review in the last decades have received a total of 15.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy Review usually cover Surgery (763 papers), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (322 papers) and Epidemiology (211 papers) specifically the topics of Shoulder Injury and Treatment (379 papers), Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques (353 papers) and Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (275 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy Review are Nicola Maffulli, David Dejour, Umile Giuseppe Longo, Andrew A. Amis, Timothy M. Simon, Douglas W. Jackson, F. Alan Barber, Gregory C. Fanelli, Vincenzo Denaro and Mario Ronga.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy Review.

Countries where authors publish in Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025