Sport History Review

270 papers and 975 indexed citations i.

About

The 270 papers published in Sport History Review in the last decades have received a total of 975 indexed citations. Papers published in Sport History Review usually cover Sociology and Political Science (168 papers), Gender Studies (156 papers) and History (58 papers) specifically the topics of Sports, Gender, and Society (155 papers), Sport and Mega-Event Impacts (122 papers) and American Sports and Literature (42 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Sport History Review are Ian Ritchie, Wray Vamplew, Norman R. Baker, Vanessa Heggie, Rob Hess, Chad Seifried, Douglas Booth, Murray G. Phillips, John Bale and Jay Scherer.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Sport History Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Sport History Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Sport History Review.

Countries where authors publish in Sport History Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Sport History Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Sport History Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sport History Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025