Spatial Economic Analysis

460 papers and 8.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 460 papers published in Spatial Economic Analysis in the last decades have received a total of 8.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Spatial Economic Analysis usually cover Economics and Econometrics (414 papers), Political Science and International Relations (67 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (60 papers) specifically the topics of Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis (253 papers), Spatial and Panel Data Analysis (188 papers) and Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (92 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Spatial Economic Analysis are J. Paul Elhorst, James P. LeSage, Philip McCann, Manfréd M. Fischer, James P. LeSage, Julie Le Gallo, Frank van Oort, Martijn Burger, Gert‐Jan Linders and Luc Anselin.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Spatial Economic Analysis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Spatial Economic Analysis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Spatial Economic Analysis.

Countries where authors publish in Spatial Economic Analysis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Spatial Economic Analysis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Spatial Economic Analysis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Spatial Economic Analysis more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025