South African Review of Sociology

363 papers and 2.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 363 papers published in South African Review of Sociology in the last decades have received a total of 2.0k indexed citations. Papers published in South African Review of Sociology usually cover Sociology and Political Science (203 papers), General Health Professions (68 papers) and Gender Studies (68 papers) specifically the topics of South African History and Culture (42 papers), Legal Issues in South Africa (34 papers) and Gender Roles and Identity Studies (29 papers). The most active scholars publishing in South African Review of Sociology are Karl von Holdt, Jìmí O. Adésínà, A.R. Vasavi, Brendan Maughan‐Brown, Glenda Kruss, Laurence Piper, Andrew Charman, Heidi Prozesky, Robert Morrell and Raewyn Connell.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in South African Review of Sociology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in South African Review of Sociology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in South African Review of Sociology.

Countries where authors publish in South African Review of Sociology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in South African Review of Sociology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in South African Review of Sociology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites South African Review of Sociology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025