Source Notes in the History of Art

349 papers and 266 indexed citations i.

About

The 349 papers published in Source Notes in the History of Art in the last decades have received a total of 266 indexed citations. Papers published in Source Notes in the History of Art usually cover History (124 papers), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (68 papers) and Classics (54 papers) specifically the topics of Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (76 papers), Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (49 papers) and Classical Antiquity Studies (29 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Source Notes in the History of Art are Paul Barolsky, Paul Collins, Edward J. Olszewski, Lynn E. Roller, Peter Ian Kuniholm, David Carrier, Graham Smith, Robert Steven Bianchi, Zainab Bahrani and Oscar White Muscarella.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Source Notes in the History of Art

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Source Notes in the History of Art. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Source Notes in the History of Art.

Countries where authors publish in Source Notes in the History of Art

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Source Notes in the History of Art. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Source Notes in the History of Art with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Source Notes in the History of Art more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025