Estudios de Literatura Colombiana

256 papers and 185 indexed citations i.

About

The 256 papers published in Estudios de Literatura Colombiana in the last decades have received a total of 185 indexed citations. Papers published in Estudios de Literatura Colombiana usually cover Sociology and Political Science (122 papers), Literature and Literary Theory (112 papers) and Cultural Studies (99 papers) specifically the topics of Latin American Literature Studies (91 papers), Literary and Cultural Studies (88 papers) and Literature, Culture, and Aesthetics (59 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Estudios de Literatura Colombiana are Ana María Agudelo Ochoa, Charles B. Moore, Òscar Castro, Pablo Montoya, Carlos Rincón, Consuelo Hernández, Florian Homann, C. Houde and Óscar Castaño.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Estudios de Literatura Colombiana

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Estudios de Literatura Colombiana. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Estudios de Literatura Colombiana.

Countries where authors publish in Estudios de Literatura Colombiana

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Estudios de Literatura Colombiana. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Estudios de Literatura Colombiana with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Estudios de Literatura Colombiana more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025