Social Work in Mental Health

676 papers and 5.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 676 papers published in Social Work in Mental Health in the last decades have received a total of 5.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Social Work in Mental Health usually cover Clinical Psychology (421 papers), General Health Professions (279 papers) and Social Psychology (208 papers) specifically the topics of Mental Health Treatment and Access (140 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (127 papers) and Patient and Public Engagement in Healthcare Research (120 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Social Work in Mental Health are Gila M. Acker, Phyllis Braudy Harris, Mary M. McKay, Jerry Floersch, Shana Nichols, Audrey Blakeley‐Smith, Irwin Epstein, Michael Surko, Lisa Burkhart and Nancy S. Hogan.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Social Work in Mental Health

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Social Work in Mental Health. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Social Work in Mental Health.

Countries where authors publish in Social Work in Mental Health

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Social Work in Mental Health. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Social Work in Mental Health with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Social Work in Mental Health more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025